<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rogers only sells 16,000 iPhones</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thisyear.ca/2008/08/05/rogers-only-sells-16000-iphones/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thisyear.ca/2008/08/05/rogers-only-sells-16000-iphones/</link>
	<description>a hodge podge blog of music, travel and news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 06:28:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://thisyear.ca/2008/08/05/rogers-only-sells-16000-iphones/comment-page-1/#comment-18231</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 13:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisyear.ca/?p=717#comment-18231</guid>
		<description>I found the population of the US to be listed at 301,139,947 (July 2007 est.) from a Google search of &quot;US population&quot;. The source was the CIA website. After following the link I see that they list the population as 303,824,646 (July 2008 est.). Those differences are not really significant in my calculations, as they all round essentially to 0.2% (if we take it to a nice round number instead of following proper rounding rules).

I still find the number of iPhones sold in Canada to be lower than I anticipated -- having never really set a number in my head to begin with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found the population of the US to be listed at 301,139,947 (July 2007 est.) from a Google search of &#8220;US population&#8221;. The source was the CIA website. After following the link I see that they list the population as 303,824,646 (July 2008 est.). Those differences are not really significant in my calculations, as they all round essentially to 0.2% (if we take it to a nice round number instead of following proper rounding rules).</p>
<p>I still find the number of iPhones sold in Canada to be lower than I anticipated &#8212; having never really set a number in my head to begin with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: garat jax</title>
		<link>http://thisyear.ca/2008/08/05/rogers-only-sells-16000-iphones/comment-page-1/#comment-18230</link>
		<dc:creator>garat jax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 13:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisyear.ca/?p=717#comment-18230</guid>
		<description>you are off on your statistics there. the american population is over 300 million (304,796,183 to be exact). with 600,000 iPhones, the percentage is actually 0.20 %. you need to check your decimals mr. science teacher, they are really important.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you are off on your statistics there. the american population is over 300 million (304,796,183 to be exact). with 600,000 iPhones, the percentage is actually 0.20 %. you need to check your decimals mr. science teacher, they are really important.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
